cgm-392x72

Wednesday, May 03, 2006

Side Dishes

Well, my curiosity got the better of me and I took the plunge. Along with Infinite Crisis #7 and a few other titles, I bought Civil War #1.

SPOILERS follow, of course.

5

4

3

2

1

The issue did have its moments. Johnny Storm getting beaten up outside the nightclub was one. The Baxter Building meeting felt a little creepy too. However, overall it felt rather familiar, mostly because the Stamford incident was strongly reminiscent of Kingdom Come's Kansas catastrophe -- right down to both being captured on TV.

Even so, I found myself wondering why something like this hadn't happened in the Marvel Universe before. Surely Galactus has caused major property damage and/or loss of life. What about that big dust-up between Count Nefaria and the Avengers in the '7os? What about Godzilla? Maybe the difference is the political climate.

Maybe the difference is in the details. Here the New Warriors were reckless, acting without thinking of the potential for civilian casualties, and without coordinating with the authorities, including other super-groups. Still, reactions on all sides seem a little disproportionate. Nitro -- the villain, right? -- willfully caused the explosion, which has to count for something. I understand that the Warriors should have called the Avengers, but the way the tragedy is set up, it sounds like a ratings chase turned horribly wrong, which doesn't seem to warrant sweeping federal legislation. It just doesn't have the impact that something involving the Fantastic Four, Spider-Man, or the Avengers would, and in terms of story, that's where Civil War #1 starts to lose me.

Goliath's mentioning the Hulk, Wolverine, and something in Philadelphia also doesn't do much for someone like me who's not really aware of the latter two events. I only know about the Hulk because it happened in Fantastic Four a few months back. (Besides, aren't people used to the Hulk's carnage by now?) It might have been better to show those events in a prologue to the book, instead of assuming either that Civil War readers would have read about them already, or that dialogue alone would do the trick.

Speaking of dialogue (ha ha), some of it just falls flat. Both Goliath and Daredevil mention "the straw that broke the camel's back," and the minister's line about "careless super-people" didn't ring true at all. The distraught mother made some good points, but otherwise she was straight out of Jaws -- except, of course, for her line about "the blood of my little Damien." That reminded me of another classic '70s film.

(Really, "Damien?" Not Toby, or Brad, or Conner? Well, maybe not Conner....)

I did like the Captain America fighter-jet sequence, though. Sadly, it wasn't enough for me to continue with this miniseries. Like I said, the proof of its effectiveness will be measured in the regular books, which is where I'll be following it from here on out.

P.S. Infinite Crisis #7 was OK, I guess. I didn't like some plot points, and it was basically two big fight scenes. The art seemed kind of rushed, mostly due to four different pencillers and six inkers. Reading it felt like being on an out-of-control train desperately trying to lose speed as it pulled into the station. On the whole, I'm not sorry I read it, but I'm glad it's over.

Now I can recover from crossover fatigue.

Read More

4 Comments:

At 5/04/2006 08:46:00 AM, Blogger joncormier said...

Yeah I agree about the whole setup. It just doesn't seem to be "right." Shouldn't there be more legislation against reality TV instead of heroes?

 
At 5/04/2006 08:54:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I disagree. If you've been following the stories leading up to this, the temperature has been steadily rising across the MU. So to me the storyline didn't come out of left field. It taps into the zeitgeist: the real-world polarization of "patriots" and "paranoids". And it doesn't hurt that the art looks great. Until this month, I had been looking for ways to cut back on my comics spending. By the time I walked out of the shop, I had added six more titles. I'm engrossed.

 
At 5/05/2006 09:48:00 AM, Blogger Tom Bondurant said...

I understand that you disagree, but you also say "if you've been following the stories." I haven't, and I hope I've been clear about that.

However, I didn't realize that the Philadelphia bombing was a reference to Ed Brubaker's first Captain America arc, which I did read (although now it seems like a long time ago). Again, though, a footnote would have helped.

 
At 5/05/2006 10:37:00 AM, Blogger Craig said...

After picking up every ish of IC, I was wary of going into Civil War (yet another "event" to eat at my wallet...)
But I bought it. And I liked it. Disclaimer: I'm a huge Cap fan, so that could be a big reason why this hit a lot of the right notes for me.

I think the gov'ts reaction makes sense for a couple reasons. They have been ramping up the destruction done by heros (accidentally) in the MU. But more than anything, I think it works because the political culture/climate is so much different now than how things used to be. These days everything is super sensationalized and when a little kid dies (especially a little white kid) all of a sudden every previous related incidence is referenced, media attention goes whole hog, distraught parents get media face time (it's good for ratings!), politicians posture on the issue to look good and stupid laws get passed. This is turning out to be the new American Way. Leave it to a foreigner to understand that. Also, for those who complained about a Scot writing about American politics, he also understands how the "spirit" of America (Cap) would be at odds with the "practice" of America (SHIELD, the gov't, etc).

 

Post a Comment

<< Home