cgm-392x72

Sunday, March 26, 2006

L.A. Times editorial on "superhero" trademark

The L.A. Times weighs in on Marvel and DC's trademark for the word "superhero":

The notion of superheroes goes back at least to 1938, when Superman made his debut in Action Comics. The term's first commercial use, the trademark holders say, was in 1966. Still, it's hard to think of "super hero" as anything more than a description of the entire category of characters, not a particular brand. As a familiar DC series so aptly puts it, there is an entire legion of superheroes, and their ranks extend far beyond the rosters created by those two companies.

In trademark law, the more unusual a term, the more it qualifies for protection. We would have no quarrel with Marvel and DC had they called their superheroes "actosapiens," then trademarked that. But purely generic terms aren't entitled to protection, at least in theory. The reason is simple: Trademarks restrict speech, and to put widely used terms under private control is an assault on our language.


Read the entire editorial.

1 Comments:

At 3/27/2006 01:21:00 AM, Blogger Brian Cronin said...

Thanks for the link, JK!

That editorial was awful, though.

The dude says superhero is generic, but then says Band-Aid isn't. And I agree that Band-Aid isn't, but to say Band-Aid isn't and then act like it is obvious that superhero IS?

Just not a good argument. I think Paul O'Brien has a heckuva lot better anti-trademark argument than this editorial guy.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home